|
Team of scientists discovers origin of HIV
Calvin professor details biological implications, cautions habitat
destruction in response to HIV research
Dr. David Koetje
Associate Professor of Biology
One remarkable thing molecular biologists have learned over the
past two decades is that at the cellular level organisms as diverse
as plants and animals share many common features.
Our bodies are made up of millions of interacting cells. These
cells all use similar mechanisms to integrate hundreds of external
and internal cues in deciding which of the thousands of genes
found in our chromosomes to turn on and which to turn off.
Our cells are also surrounded by a membrane barrier with gatekeeper
proteins which regulate the movement of various molecules across
it. If the cell is to survive, these proteins must take in dozens
of food and signal molecules and keep out hundreds of potential
invaders (such as viruses).
Occasionally, things in the body go wrong. Our molecular machinery
makes mistakes. Some of those mistakes lead to mutations -- permanent
genetic changes.
Mutations are also caused by environmental factors such as ultraviolet
light. Once in a great while, a mutation fundamentally alters
the function of molecules, cells, and organisms.
In the case of HIV, such mutations are thought to be the reason
why this virus was able to spread to a new host, humans, by getting
into white blood cells via one of the gatekeeper proteins. What
we have not known with certainty, until now, is from which previous
host did this infection spread.
Since the earliest cases of AIDS were detected in Africa, this
was a logical place to start looking. Within a few years, scientists
detected similar viruses (SIVs) in monkeys and chimps, although
these infections do not develop into AIDS.
Now, by comparing DNA fingerprints of HIV and SIV gene sequences
from dozens of isolates across the globe, researchers have finally
identified the HIV-SIV link. Humans apparently can become infected
with HIV via direct contact with blood or meat of chimps infected
with a mutant form of SIV.
How do we respond to this as a Christian community? First of all,
we should affirm a statement in a recent New York Times article
that precisely why the AIDS epidemic came when it did is not
known. We should guard against callous preaching that AIDS is
the direct result of divine retribution on modern sexual promiscuity.
This research suggests that the first HIV infections occurred
in the 1940s or earlier, long before the sexual revolution of
the 1960s and 70s. God is surely angry with sin, but has he not
charged us with the task of spreading the good news of salvation
in Jesus? Those suffering from HIV infection dont need our contempt.
Second, we should heed the alarm in this article that human activities
(overhunting and habitat destruction) are forcing this chimp species
to the brink of extinction. Studying this chimp species may
open new insights into our understanding of AIDS.
Even more importantly, protecting these chimps and their habitats
is a critical ministry of Christian stewardship. Such protection
would affirm their position as Gods invaluable creation. Would
our intervention also force us to deal more closely with the social-economic
plight of African nations?
Finally, when we are frightened by the threat of another disease
pandemic looming on the horizon, we can rest assured in the promises
of God. The one who called everything into being continues to
uphold all his creatures, so that not a hair can fall from our
heads without the will of our heavenly Father. |