Misunderstood concept of ``Editorial''

I thought the editorial ``Airband examined'', while perhaps giving some valid criticisms of this year's Airband, had elements that I found inappropriate. The personal attacks throughout the piece were completely uncalled for, and, I think, a misuse of editorial power. I would suggest that if Miller or CVN has a problem with the Airband Committee or any of its members, they should address it privately. If CVN felt that they were ``punished'' as a result of what happened, an impartial public explanation would have been appropriate. However, finger-pointing and public humiliation of any party involved was not necessary or kind.

Sarah Brown, `02

Scholten redefines ``integrity''

Making something out of nothing is perhaps the number one goal of last week's ``Airband examined'' article. I found myself grossly amused, yet sufficiently disgusted that such yellow journalism has infiltrated our humble school newspaper. Without elaborating on the subjective nature and misinformation spread throughout the article, I have two major reactions. First and foremost, CVN did a fine job with their videos. However, last time I checked, Airband was a lip-syncing contest, not a film festival. Technical difficulties are sometimes unavoidable, and the overall goal of the show must be carried out, even if this means cutting videos of hard-working people.

Second, if any students (or Chimes editors) truly feel that their Friday night, existence on earth, or walk with Christ was somehow tarnished by Airband or the apparent corruption within, I encourage them to talk directly to me about it. I see no value in the article that was run, as it was destructive to the integrity of Airband Committee, CVN and Chimes. Forgive me for making even more out of nothing.

Tim Scholten, Airband Committee

Library Airport needs new location

As a long-time resident of The Hekman Library's fourth floor, I am concerned about the recent reopening of The Hekman ``Library Airport'' near my study carrel. What was once the quietest, cleanest, and safest haven from an otherwise intolerable confusion of undergraduates (their noisy screaming forever coming across the sky) has been reduced to nothing more than a perch for the aeronautic fantasies of suburban elect. While I fully recognize the need for a The Hekman ``Library Airport,'' I believe that there are other venues far more appropriate than the fourth floor - i.e. the fifth floor. Not only would the fifth floor provide easier access for arriving and departing aircraft - as it boasts superior visibility and landing space - but, as we all know, the bitter reality remains that no real work gets done up there ... ever. Perpetuating the myth of fifth-floor productivity only makes co-dependents of us all.

W.H. Jellema, '01